Jaina (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
effervescible) wrote2004-04-07 11:00 am
effervescible) wrote2004-04-07 11:00 am
Entry tags:
Bitch, please.
I knew I was going to get pissed when I read this headline in the editorials section of today's BG News: "Video games are a detriment to society." Lo and behold, I was right! Quoth the article, which can also be found here:
By Megan Schmidt
April 07, 2004
Wasting time is a specialty for many college students. It is an art we spend four (sometimes five) years perfecting; a skill we lovingly hone through countless hours of procrastination and doing silly things that take up significant amounts of time: chatting on AIM with a buddy that lives two steps away, watching American Idol or plopping yourself on the couch and engaging in a video game. Ah, yes, the video game. I dislike video games quite a bit. "But, they're fun!" you say.
Well, sure they are. Guess what, I don't like fun, either. I'm far too busy criticizing everything around me to enjoy one iota of fun. So, I'm planning to rain on everyone's parade and inform you of why I find video games to be stressful, unnecessary and downright detrimental to the youth of the nation.
That is what they are ---- a detriment. A means of preventing a person from accomplishing anything ---- that is, if you allow them to.
I've seen papers go unwritten, significant others neglected and personal hygiene abandoned, all for the sake of a Tony Hawk fix. Frankly, I think it is quite scary. In fact, it is an epidemic.
I'd like to say that the current obsession with Playstation, X-Box and other game systems stems from a more innocent place ---- like the Nintendos and Segas of our childhood. But are those pesky Mario brothers really to blame?
Sure, they were just a couple of Italian plumbers trying to save a princess (which my feminist side wants to object to, but I'll refrain for the purposes of staying relevant,) but were they just a gateway drug to the more hardcore gaming?
Why are we logging hours in front of a screen, only to end up with blistered fingers and carpal tunnel? Why are games filled with more violent and sexually-degrading content? (I unleash the feminist Megan for a mere second, only to quip, "what woman really looks like Laura Croft anyway?")
I didn't play many video games as a kid. Nintendo was absent from my childhood, or at least in my home, with the exception of playing (more often watching) the occasional video game at a friend's house. Even when I did play, I didn't gain much satisfaction from it. I felt kind of stressed when I had the controller in my sweaty hands. Maybe because my friends were so much better at video games than I was and I became anxious with the knowledge that I was a goner.
In retrospect, I'm glad I grew up virtually without video games. In fact, I'd strongly consider raising my kids precisely the same way. Kids don't need to be deprived of these games, but some serious regulation could definitely be in order in many cases.
I believe my lack of access to video games made me a more creative person. I had to find other ways to entertain myself, such as having actual social interaction with other children. If my memory serves me correctly, I do believe (sometimes) I even read books!
People need to learn that they don't need a million things flashing, beeping and exploding in their faces to be entertained. They would be much better off if they learned this. Maybe then we wouldn't have to sit around and think, "hmm, why are our children obese and lazy and why on earth do they have such poor literacy scores?"
Why don't you unplug the game system occasionally, go outside and breath some real-life fresh air? Climb a tree, skin a knee or something ---- anything. Read a book. I've got some old Goosebumps books in my basement. Do you want some of those? People still read those right?
I don't think playing an occasional video game is horrible. It does serve a recreational purpose for some. But when it interferes with a child/college student/mysteriously unemployed person's ability to function or accomplish things away from the television set, then we have a problem.
So the next time you're thinking of skipping class (again) because you're playing "Grand Theft Auto," think twice about what you're doing. God knows we're an apathetic, disaffected bunch as it is, without that extra push from the good people at Sony.
Send all comments to: schmeg@bgnet.bgsu.edu
Lovely, huh? It prompted me to send a letter in response. Only the God Squad's obsessive, daily articles about how we're all going to Hell if we don't accept Jesus into our hearts pushed me this close, and in the end I didn't bother because it might prompt more obsessive, daily articles. (Note that I am not anti-religion. I'm sort of paddling in the waters of faith myself. But enough is enough, people, we get the idea.) My letter as follows:
I am writing in response to Megan Schmidt’s Wednesday opinion column, “Video games are a detriment to society”. Gosh, Megan, over-generalize much? She does have a single good point in her article: “When [playing video games] interferes with a child/college student/mysteriously unemployed person’s ability to function or accomplish things away from the television set, then we have a problem.” Sure, this is a problem—but it would be just as true if you replaced “playing video games” with “watching movies” or “surfing the internet” or even “reading books”, which is one of Megan’s suggestions.
The fact of the matter is that any behavior or hobby taken to excess will lead to problems. Video games are no more likely to lead to obsession than any other hobby. I could be wrong—it could be just a fluke that I’m both an honors student and a gamer and (gasp) a girl, but somehow I doubt it. I’ve known plenty of gamers and plenty of non-gamers, and guess what? Lazy people fit into both categories.
It’s fine that you don’t like video games, Megan. It’s fine that you would restrict your children’s access to games; I absolutely agree that children should do more things than play video games. But don’t assume that video games are the root of laziness and lack of social interaction, either; it’s simply not true.
I really hope they publish it. Bullshit like this needs to be kicked in the head. And Megan, if you should ever happen to stumble across my humble little lj entry? Blow me.
By Megan Schmidt
April 07, 2004
Wasting time is a specialty for many college students. It is an art we spend four (sometimes five) years perfecting; a skill we lovingly hone through countless hours of procrastination and doing silly things that take up significant amounts of time: chatting on AIM with a buddy that lives two steps away, watching American Idol or plopping yourself on the couch and engaging in a video game. Ah, yes, the video game. I dislike video games quite a bit. "But, they're fun!" you say.
Well, sure they are. Guess what, I don't like fun, either. I'm far too busy criticizing everything around me to enjoy one iota of fun. So, I'm planning to rain on everyone's parade and inform you of why I find video games to be stressful, unnecessary and downright detrimental to the youth of the nation.
That is what they are ---- a detriment. A means of preventing a person from accomplishing anything ---- that is, if you allow them to.
I've seen papers go unwritten, significant others neglected and personal hygiene abandoned, all for the sake of a Tony Hawk fix. Frankly, I think it is quite scary. In fact, it is an epidemic.
I'd like to say that the current obsession with Playstation, X-Box and other game systems stems from a more innocent place ---- like the Nintendos and Segas of our childhood. But are those pesky Mario brothers really to blame?
Sure, they were just a couple of Italian plumbers trying to save a princess (which my feminist side wants to object to, but I'll refrain for the purposes of staying relevant,) but were they just a gateway drug to the more hardcore gaming?
Why are we logging hours in front of a screen, only to end up with blistered fingers and carpal tunnel? Why are games filled with more violent and sexually-degrading content? (I unleash the feminist Megan for a mere second, only to quip, "what woman really looks like Laura Croft anyway?")
I didn't play many video games as a kid. Nintendo was absent from my childhood, or at least in my home, with the exception of playing (more often watching) the occasional video game at a friend's house. Even when I did play, I didn't gain much satisfaction from it. I felt kind of stressed when I had the controller in my sweaty hands. Maybe because my friends were so much better at video games than I was and I became anxious with the knowledge that I was a goner.
In retrospect, I'm glad I grew up virtually without video games. In fact, I'd strongly consider raising my kids precisely the same way. Kids don't need to be deprived of these games, but some serious regulation could definitely be in order in many cases.
I believe my lack of access to video games made me a more creative person. I had to find other ways to entertain myself, such as having actual social interaction with other children. If my memory serves me correctly, I do believe (sometimes) I even read books!
People need to learn that they don't need a million things flashing, beeping and exploding in their faces to be entertained. They would be much better off if they learned this. Maybe then we wouldn't have to sit around and think, "hmm, why are our children obese and lazy and why on earth do they have such poor literacy scores?"
Why don't you unplug the game system occasionally, go outside and breath some real-life fresh air? Climb a tree, skin a knee or something ---- anything. Read a book. I've got some old Goosebumps books in my basement. Do you want some of those? People still read those right?
I don't think playing an occasional video game is horrible. It does serve a recreational purpose for some. But when it interferes with a child/college student/mysteriously unemployed person's ability to function or accomplish things away from the television set, then we have a problem.
So the next time you're thinking of skipping class (again) because you're playing "Grand Theft Auto," think twice about what you're doing. God knows we're an apathetic, disaffected bunch as it is, without that extra push from the good people at Sony.
Send all comments to: schmeg@bgnet.bgsu.edu
Lovely, huh? It prompted me to send a letter in response. Only the God Squad's obsessive, daily articles about how we're all going to Hell if we don't accept Jesus into our hearts pushed me this close, and in the end I didn't bother because it might prompt more obsessive, daily articles. (Note that I am not anti-religion. I'm sort of paddling in the waters of faith myself. But enough is enough, people, we get the idea.) My letter as follows:
I am writing in response to Megan Schmidt’s Wednesday opinion column, “Video games are a detriment to society”. Gosh, Megan, over-generalize much? She does have a single good point in her article: “When [playing video games] interferes with a child/college student/mysteriously unemployed person’s ability to function or accomplish things away from the television set, then we have a problem.” Sure, this is a problem—but it would be just as true if you replaced “playing video games” with “watching movies” or “surfing the internet” or even “reading books”, which is one of Megan’s suggestions.
The fact of the matter is that any behavior or hobby taken to excess will lead to problems. Video games are no more likely to lead to obsession than any other hobby. I could be wrong—it could be just a fluke that I’m both an honors student and a gamer and (gasp) a girl, but somehow I doubt it. I’ve known plenty of gamers and plenty of non-gamers, and guess what? Lazy people fit into both categories.
It’s fine that you don’t like video games, Megan. It’s fine that you would restrict your children’s access to games; I absolutely agree that children should do more things than play video games. But don’t assume that video games are the root of laziness and lack of social interaction, either; it’s simply not true.
I really hope they publish it. Bullshit like this needs to be kicked in the head. And Megan, if you should ever happen to stumble across my humble little lj entry? Blow me.
no subject
no subject
Okay, this line here in the column just said it all. You never had video games growing up. You never got into it, so now you dislike everyone who is obsessed with it.
In a way, I relate to her not liking video games, which is an opinion. I don't like to play video games, I similarly did not have it growing up (with the exception of our Atari, where the games were simple enough that I could get into it) -- and I feel, that, because of that, I don't like playing it.
HOWEVER, I bought my hubby an X-Box for Christmas a couple years ago, and I have no problem with him having it. I have plenty of friends who play games. Yes, video games are a distraction, but so is EVERYTHING when you're trying to avoid something! Just because I didn't have video games doesn't mean I didn't do everything in my nature possible to avoid doing an assignment to the last possible minute... I did all kinds of useless crap so I could avoid work - read old magazines, surfed the internet, cleaned my room .... (heh) ...
In other words, video games are not the root of the problem. People have a nature to procrastinate. And that is the root of the problem here. Video games are just ONE medium to encourage it.
The real problem here is that this girl has something against video games, and she's trying to attach that to a legitmate and general problem that really has nothing to do with this one individual thing. I agree with the letter you wrote, and do hope you get published. ;)
no subject
Read below ...
Guess what, I don't like fun, either. I'm far too busy criticizing everything around me to enjoy one iota of fun. So, I'm planning to rain on everyone's parade and inform you of why I find video games to be stressful, unnecessary and downright detrimental to the youth of the nation.
no subject
Playing Video Games Improves Surgeons' Skills
no subject
no subject
no subject
I don't play video games that often and I find PLENTY of ways to rot my brain that don't do me any good whatsoever.
no subject
...Like LJ, for a start...
no subject
Speaking of which, I'd rather be playing a video game than shooting up.
Ooh, I see an advertising campaign. They could hire ex-junkies and give them all Gamecubes. They'd play Super Mario Kart Double Dash and then turn to the camera, give the audience the "unrehearsed meaningful look" and say, I'd rather be playing my Nintendo Gamecube than shoot up.
They could then get all sorts of endowment money from the National Drug-Free Association!
no subject
Really really obnoxious editorial, but at least she didn't "science" it up with misused statistics (okay, these are my issues with my school paper talking). I know you've probably already send it out, but can I point out her self-contradictory logic of video games=obese kids therefore kids should read books? And the Lara Croft mention? Good to know that journalists still rely on information they can snag off of CNN for outdated pop-culture references rather than doing *actual* research.
no subject
And Lara Croft...geez. She couldn't have brought up favourite GTA3? Or Dead or Alive? You should've added that, for the time, Lara Croft was revolutionary because she was a strong female lead with her own video game (and name in the title! Samus never got that), which didn't revolve around "pink, girly plots" like hunting for the Cradle of Life at the Gap. Her figure, while somewhat excessively busty, was a result of the technology of the day - flowy, baggy clothes would be a bit harder to animate.
And I hope she stumbles across your LJ entry AND they print your response ^_^
>^..^
no subject
no subject
I long for a day when the world's population stops pointing fingers and laying blame for society's ills at the feet of any form of entertainment known to humankind. Suck it up. Look in the goddamn mirror, and take some responsibility, chum. And we wonder why there's a generation of selfish brats running rampant? Nothing is their fault, apparently.
And, while we're speaking of things that are detrimental to the life of the average college student, how about the CHRONIC FRICKIN' DRINKING TO EXCESS. Where's the damned editorial on that?
Just a thought.
no subject
no subject
And Goosebumps? No wonder her writing style is so fucking lazy. She was raised on literary schlock. If she's gonna get all high toned and moral, shouldn't she mention a book that isn't the same kind of mind candy as video games?
no subject